Another thing which helped me and my anti-divestment bill allies was community support; we couldn’t have won the divestment bill battle alone. The first point to note here is that, as pro-Israel activists, we naturally were up against an opponent with a high level of community support - after all, we were in Berkeley, a community with far more than its share of extremist politics. The entire San Francisco Bay Area was named by the Reut Institute as one of five “hubs” of delegitimization of Israel in the world today (the others being London, Toronto, Madrid and Brussels). This may not be as much of a problem in other areas, but communities with colleges and universities are generally going to be politically aligned with so-called “peace and justice” movements. As a result of this it can take some effort to network and get strong community representation, but this can be a pivotal factor, and in fact is probably necessary to winning wars against anti-Israel campus groups, at least on campuses in cities which are generally anti-Israel themselves, or which have a strong and outspoken anti-Israel community. But beyond the necessity of getting community support in order not to look more marginal than the anti-Israel forces, Jewish community support can provide invaluable help in speaking out for the Jewish community in America or even just locally; SJP made a point of bringing in numerous area Jews who are anti-Israel, in order to give the Senate the impression that a great number of Jews, generally, are anti-Israel. The best way to counter this tactic is to bring in powerful and prominent Jewish voices to lend support for
A great example of the way community support can help win battles against
Individuals from groups such as the San Francisco Jewish Community Relations Council (JCRC) and San Francisco Voice for Israel (the San Francisco chapter of the influential and prominent pro-Israel organization Stand With Us), showed up and spoke eloquently and powerfully on behalf of their organizations against divestment, showing the Senate (and everyone else in the room) that a small number of disgruntled and rabid Jews, mostly from Berkeley, supporting divestment from Israel can’t be taken as representative of Bay Area Jewry. In addition, Adam Naftalin-Kelman (as I have mentioned), Executive Director of Berkeley Hillel, and even Akiva Tor, Consul General of Israel for the Pacific Northwest region of the United States, spoke out at the meeting against the divestment bill. Numerous Rabbis from the Bay Area spoke as well. In addition, a coalition of local and national groups published a letter in the Daily Californian condemning the divestment bill. This letter was supported not only by the groups that one would expect, such as the ADL, the Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco, the Jewish Community Relations Council, and StandWithUs, but was also signed by the New Israel Fund and J Street. Those last two groups are known within the pro-Israel community for their often outspoken criticism of Israel. But the divestment movement, with its overt delegitimization of Israel, was something all of these groups could unite against.
All of this sent the message that the 200,000-member Bay Area Jewish community cannot be taken to be represented by several dozen anti-Israel fanatics. Indeed, the presence and support of local leaders in the Bay Area Jewish community was invaluable, I think, to our success in keeping the divestment bill from passing.
It is worth noting that pro-Israel community members living in the city where one’s university is located and in neighboring areas, both those working professionally for Jewish organizations and those with non-Jewish-related jobs, will often be better informed on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and better and more experienced public speakers on this issue than college Israel advocates, and this can be a great boon. In many ways, many of the community Jews of the area in which one goes to college can be seen as the ‘big brothers’ of members of groups such as Tikvah. These people have had decades of experience fighting anti-Israel forces, are more well read on the Arab/Israeli conflict and the PR war which is currently raging, and often are former members of campus pro-Israel groups themselves. Moreover, community members sympathetic to one’s cause, especially when the cause is one as bitterly fought as our own cause of Israel advocacy, often will, in my experience, go out of their way to help university students. Finding community
Which brings me to my next point: How one should, and can, network with local pro-Israel and Jewish groups and individuals.
Meeting and collaborating with community members is actually very easy, daunting though it may seem to a college student (and it certainly felt daunting to me at first). For one thing, major cities and areas in the United States often have branches of pro-Israel organizations, such as AIPAC or Stand With Us; contacting these local branches is an excellent idea, and is very easy and helpful, especially since these professional advocacy groups consider it part of their own agenda to reach out to offer support to college students ‘in the trenches’. Numerous pro-Israel organizations in America as a matter of fact will organize yearly conferences or trips, which can take place either in America or in Israel, designed to educate college Israel advocates on the history of Israel and the Arabs and on advocacy techniques; I probably learned half of what I know about how to do Israel advocacy from attending the yearly Stand With Us Israel advocacy conference in the Fall of 2007. But simply contacting local groups for assistance is very easy; sending an email usually does the trick.
Aside from local pro-Israel groups, which can often offer financial assistance as well as assistance with putting on campus events, another good resource can be local synagogues. For one thing, Jewish professors on one’s university, or those who are even mildly religiously active, will likely go to a synagogue near the campus, so going to synagogues is one way to meet these professors and network with them in an informal environment. However, not all synagogues choose to get involved in such issues, and there are even some synagogues whose communities are far from a pro-Israel alignment. The best way to get access to
Professors on campus can be extremely helpful allies as well. It’s no secret that academia in our country (and indeed in other countries, notably England) is home to many of the worst anti-Israel personalities in the country: Noam Chomsky is the most famous example, but others abound, such as recently disgraced and fired DePaul professor (and professional Israel hater) Norman Finkelstein. As a result of the fact that anti-Israel groups on campus can and do appeal to professors on ‘their side’ for help, it’s critical that pro-Israel groups and students do the same. And while many pro-Israel professors, in my experience, are somewhat hesitant to get involved in campus student politics and activism, if one looks they can find (usually Jewish) pro-Israel professors who aren’t afraid to speak out. Indeed, when the Chair of the Jewish Studies program at Berkeley, Professor Ronald Hendel, published a letter in the Daily Californian, the campus newspaper, exposing the divestment bill effort as plainly an anti-Israel effort, and not one which had to do with opposing war crimes in the world as the bill’s authors tried to claim, was extremely helpful to Tikvah and to the greater effort to oppose the bill.
8. Networking on campus
There is one last thing I’d like to mention. Much as reaching out to community members and groups sympathetic to the cause of
The most obvious students and student groups to appeal to for help are, of course, the Jewish ones. The fact that the anti-divestment-bill effort on campus saw most of the Jewish groups at Berkeley unite together against the bill was absolutely essential to seeing this bill fail. The clearest display of this fact was when sixteen Jewish groups on campus, most of whom never engage in real Israel advocacy, came together, reportedly under the leadership of Berkeley Hillel, to sign a statement opposing the divestment bill. During the course of the divestment bill fight (not long after the bill was initially vetoed), SJP published a letter in the Daily Californian student campus newspaper titled “We Are Jews and We Support Divestment” which had hundreds of campus and community signers, including some Berkeley graduates and professors. This letter was read by thousands on campus. As I noted earlier, this illustrates the tactic SJP and other anti-Israel groups use, assembling as many anti-Israel Jews as possible and bringing them out in force in an attempt to convince bystanders that American (and local) Jewry is in fact divided heavily when it comes to
What kept the SJP letter from being a runaway success for the anti-Israel movement on campus was that shortly after its publication, another letter would be published in the Daily Californian, a letter urging that the
Bringing the Jewish community together on campus against divestment was essential to killing the divestment bill. However, one area which Tikvah, in my estimation, needs to improve at in order to continue gaining strength on campus (and therefore, in order to ensure that no future divestment bills or bills of that nature pass at
It is also extremely important to network with and form allegiances with non-Jewish campus student organizations. There are several very clear advantages this brings. For one, it is a given, I take it, that on any major college campus, SJP or whomever happens to be the resident anti-Israel group on campus is well situated in campus politics and has many allies and allied groups. Touching on the point I just made above, this means that SJP or whomever is more likely to be seen by bystanders as credible than a lone, largely Jewish pro-Israel group would be. Even a pro-Israel group which is allied with many Jewish groups will not look as credible as an anti-Israel group which is allied with many student groups which deal with issues unrelated to the
Another reason it is very important to network and make allies with other student communities and student groups is that it gives a political advantage: On Berkeley, SJP had a plethora of allied groups and communities which could be counted on to vote for SJP members running for Senate (and who could be counted on to support the divestment bill). At Berkeley SJP became very powerful by making many allies in other student communities – the African Americans, the Hispanics, the gay rights and women’s rights groups and environmentalist groups. Were it not for the fact that one of the two major political parties at Berkeley has many Jews, and by extension a good amount of pro-Israel sentiment within its ranks, Tikvah would not have had an easy time, in my estimation, convincing too many others (read: non-Jews) to oppose the divestment bill At campuses where student government is organized based on political parties as at UC Berkeley, making alliances can be important in just getting people elected who won’t allow the student government to be hijacked by the BDS movement.
Strength is in numbers, and, at colleges, in diversity within one’s ranks.
Incidentally, networking and making allies with other student communities is much easier than one might suspect. Many student groups want to reach out and learn about other student groups, and so scheduling a mixer between one’s own pro-Israel group and, say, a Christian group or an Indian group isn’t hard and can be very rewarding. It’s especially easy if members of one’s own group are good friends with members of another group. Frankly, mixers are especially good to do because they lead to friendships being made, and one student community will be willing to go to bat for another when they have good friends in the other community. There is no substitute for personal connections. And of course, all of this advice concerning networking with non-Jewish student groups and communities can be applied more generally, seeing as networking and making friends with non-Jewish off-campus groups obviously can help immensely too.
Politically, there are certain groups that are worth approaching as allies: LGBT groups, environmental groups, Indian students and Armenian students. The first two are relatively obvious, though LGBT groups have far too often allied themselves with anti-Israel groups that support extremely homophobic and hateful entities such as Hamas. India and Israel have strong ties and both see themselves as targets of radical Islamic terror groups (in India’s case, from Pakistan); in fact several prominent representatives of the Indian-American student community on campus spoke out against the divestment bill and helped the Jewish community and Tikvah in its struggle against that bill. Armenian students, in the current political climate of Turkish anti-Israel activism, may also be receptive, though wary because of Israel’s previous close ties with Turkey; Armenian students also, in my experience, can relate to Jewish students, as they see the Armenian genocide of the 1910s as akin to the Nazi Holocaust, and therefore see themselves as brethren to the Jewish people.
This goes along with a more general point, that it’s important to be politically involved and to take the time to get to know the ‘power players’ on one’s campus. Getting a person from one’s own student group elected to student government is the most prized possession, and leads to a number of positive things – visibility for one’s student group, an ability to help shape campus rules and discourse, one guaranteed ‘no’ vote on anti-Israel bills in the student Senate – with the relatively minor downside that with a student government official in office from one’s group, it’s very important for the student group itself to act maturely on campus and to comport itself well (lest the group have a harder time electing another member in the future). But even just networking with student government officials is a good idea, since many of them, in my experience, genuinely care to hear what their constituents (read: students at their university) think, and are willing to hear out one’s opinions on matters on campus (for instance, things like anti-Israel bills). It’s best to do this networking before things like anti-Israel bills come up; at that point, Senators are likely to be paying attention to their personal friends, as well as their party leaders and colleagues. It is worth noting, on a side note, that anti-Israel groups, at least at California universities, are, more and more, planning to take over university student governments more generally these days, for the purpose of having the power to pass whatever bills they so desire.
In sum, we in Tikvah: Students for
Ariel Kaplan
B.A., Philosophy, 2010
UC Berkeley
groups like SJP already take the time to spread the notion that pro-Israel students on campus are only pro-Israel because they’re Jewish
ReplyDeletenonsense - this contradicts what you yourself wrote about SJP trying to show that the Jewish community is split on these issues
The Jewish community is NOT split on this issue. Except for extremists on the hard right and on the hard left, the mainstream Jewish community overwhelmingly supports the existence of Israel as a homeland for the Jewish people.
ReplyDeleteOrganizations such as "Jewish" Voice for Peace (that boast mostly non-Jewish supporters such as Paul Larudee) are considered as far outside the tent of mainstream, contemporary practice as "Jews for Jesus"
Part of the plan to destroy Israel is to weaken Jewish support: Arafat in a speech to Arab diplomats in Stockholm, Sweden (Jan 30, 1996) said: "We of the P.L.O. will now concentrate all our efforts on splitting Israel psychologically into two camps."
They have not suceeded, but they are still trying
Its extremely important for the anti-Israel forces to create the illusion of internal dissent within the Jewish community. That is why such clear and unambiguous Zionist statements that have been made by the local Jewish Federation have been met with such concern by the haters.
ReplyDelete"For Americans to be persuaded [to support the Palestinian cause]," says Hany Khalil, organizing coordinator for United for Peace and Justice, a national antiwar organization that opposes the Israeli occupation, "we have to build support across all sectors of the United States, and that will never happen without a significant and visible split within the Jewish community."
Arie Kaplan's article, while it drew extensvely on my articles about Divestment and the ISM, contained some errors.
ReplyDeleteFootnote 3 correctly refers to my article, THE ISM-TERROR Connection as a reference about Emiliano Huet-Vaughan and his armed terrorist buddies in photos, but that article did not concern a divestment conference in 2006, but rather a volunteer from Stop the ISM, my non-profit who joined the ISM in Israel and took photos of ISM members disguised as Jews and carrying machine guns in the presence of a terrorist. The Conference he refers to was at Georgetown in my article the Divestment Conference at Georgetown that did run at Front Page Magazine in 2006 http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=5159 and an earlier article titled Campus Rally for Terror that ran in 2003 at http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=15272. Arab infiltration of Hillel goes back nearly seven years with Kesher Enoshi's predecessor, Tzedek, in Hillel. Tzedek sponsored and there still is a video of a "refusers" panel on the University website. Most of Ariel Kaplan's article was taken from research in my articles without proper attribution. If anyone wants to know the best ways to fight the BDS movement, they can reach me through leekaplan@dafka.org and review my archive of articles at
http://archive.frontpagemag.com/bioAuthor.aspx?AUTHID=1675
Finally, divulging strategy to the other side is never a wise move. If you can't find original things to write, then leave the space blank a day of two. I have very effective BDS countermeasures that were still not mentioned in this article, so hopefully students at Cal will contact me to utilize them, as well as students from other campuses. Proper attribution of research would be appreciated within the article and in the future. I also would prefer reference to my websites against BDS at www.StoptheISM.com and DAFKA.org .
Lee Kaplan
possible inaccuracies notwithstanding regarding references, i found this account fascinating to read. i was moreover impressed with the courage and determination of this action; i hope it will in turn give courage and ideas to pro-israel student bodies around the world to find ways to stand up to bullying at the hands of essentially obsessed opponents.
ReplyDeletein response to lee kaplan's remarks, it's important to remember to validate students' brave, and in this case successful, efforts to take a stand against what must often seem to be an overwhelming and personal attack. i applaud ariel and his team's thought and hard work, and bid them to remember that the battle is only part of the war.
an australian reader
The ISM (International Solidarity Movement) has sent out multiple copies of this, looking for a way to use it against the Jewish community (Jews unifying and cooperating towards a goal- proof positive that the Protocols still live! )
ReplyDeleteAnonymous (the last "anonymous" poster) -
ReplyDeleteI find that flattering.
Australian reader -
Thank you, and I'm glad you enjoyed the article.
Mr. Lee Kaplan -
I did give you full credit when I cited you, and mentioned your name in some of my footnotes. I was hoping some folks would be curious about you as a result and look you up online, since I knew your writings can be helpful to Israel advocates.
That said, I question the validity of your insinuation that your ideas concerning how to fight campus BDS efforts are more trustworthy than mine...seeing as I was fighting it on the ground at Cal and I just graduated from college and from 3 years of hardcore Israel advocacy there.
I apologize if I was not clear in some of my citations. The ISM-Terror Connection article didn't seem to specify what exactly the event the ISM infiltrator went to was; it seemed to me to be a conference, so that's what I wrote. I did not write that it was a divestment conference, rather that it was an ISM conference.
I resent the accusation that 'most' of my article was taken from your writings. No, most of the article was taken from my own experiences. I briefly cited some of your writings, and I gave you full credit via footnotes. While I appreciate your work, and I'm glad it's available online, my article didn't draw that heavily on it, rather it was a useful supplement.
The only error, if you can call it that, which I made was in labeling the ISM event your infiltrator went to as a 'conference', by which I meant an ISM conference. I may have been slightly - slightly - sloppy in one other citation of yours, the last one on the Lina Othman event (the event she attended), since I sort of just dropped the quote without explaining it. But I don't feel that harmed my piece at all.
As far as I can tell I gave you due credit. And I appreciate your hard work in fighting the good fight in the Bay Area. But the scope of these pieces was the situation on campus, which my friends and I have been dealing with personally for the past few years.
Ariel Kaplan
The Jewish state, the bible called them the people of God. They have been in so much travel, so much change and so much wars. They land should rest a bit. But it has been till the creations of the nation that Israel is evil spoken. The jews birth christianity, Cause Jesus was an Israelite and Jew. May God keep them and lead them.
ReplyDelete